Content
| FAN Chongyi |
| Professor Fan Chongyi, one of the 100 jurists who have powerful and far-reaching influence on the development of the rule of law in China, is a well-known professor of law and Ph.D. |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| LI Bensen |
| Professor Li Bensen is the vice Dean of CUPL Procedural Law Research Institute. He graduated from Nanjing Normal University in 1990, got Master Degree at East of China University of Politics and Law |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| GU Yongzhong |
| Professor Gu Yongzhong is the researcher of CUPL Procedure Law Research Institute. He graduated from Shanxi Normal University in 1982 and got Master Degree IN 1985 and Doctoral Degree in 2003 |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| LI Zheng |
| Professor Li Zheng is the researcher of CUPL Procedural Law Research Institute. He graduated from Shandong University in 2002 and got Master Degree in 2005 and Doctoral Degree in 2008 at CUPL. He |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| TAN Qiugui |
| Professor Tan Qiugui is the researcher of CUPL Procedural Law Research Institute. He graduated from Hunan Nomal University in 1990 and got Master degree in 1995 at the University also. He got |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| WANG Zhenhui |
| Associate Professor Wang Zhenhui is the researcher of CUPL Procedure Law Research Institute. He got Master Degree in 2008 and Doctoral Degree in 2011 at CUPL. He is also the researcher |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| YANG Yuguan |
| Professor Yang Yuguan is the researcher of CUPL Procedure Law Research Institute. He graduated from CUPL in 1983, got Master Degree in 1986 and Doctoral Degree in 1999 at CUPL as well. • Professor |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| 5th November, 2019, Faculty Workshop: Improvement of Death Penalty Review Procedures, g... |
| The first Faculty Workshop in Autumn Semester 2019 invited Professor Chen Guangzhong as the speaker addressing the topic “Improvement of Death Penalty Review Procedures”. Professor Chen delivered |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| The first plenary meeting of the new Management Committee of CHEN Guangzhong Procedural... |
| On 28th December, 2019, the first plenary meeting of the new Management Committee of CHEN Guangzhong Procedural Law Scholarship Fund was held successfully. |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| Procedural Law High-end Forum (2019) |
| On 30th November, 2019, Procedural Law High-end Forum (2019): “ Developing Trends and Issues of Procedural System in the New Era” was held successfully. |
| Time:2021-06-09 |
| |
| 龙宗智：论我国诉讼证据审查要素及审查方法的调整改革 |
| 内容提要：我国诉讼证据审查的基本逻辑是，以“三性”审查为基础，以“定案根据”确认为依归，同时审查判断证明力，进而认定事实。英美法系和大陆法系的证据审查则呈现为证据资格与证据效用两分格局，其证据法着重规制前端证据资格，而证据“三性”以特定方式嵌入证据制度。我国现行证据审查制度具有要素清晰、审查方式较为灵活等特点，但其平面化特征妨碍了证据审查逻辑的清晰展开；“三性”审查缺乏精准界定及必要区分，且 |
| Time:2023-09-17 |
| |
| 傅郁林：知识产权禁令中双方当事人权益保护 |
| 作者简介 傅郁林（1965），女，湖北襄阳人，北京大学法学院教授，博士生导师，法学博士。 摘 要：知识产权禁令本是一项独立的、实体的诉讼请求，可视为我国的行为给付之诉。中间禁令区别于永久禁令的要义是救济的紧急性与效力的临时性，以及与之匹配的程序的简单性和证明标准的低阶性，但仍是针对实体争议展开的平等对抗。因此，针对是否发布禁令所进行的司法审查与裁判而对损害的“不可弥补性”和胜诉可能性的评估 |
| Time:2023-09-17 |
| |
| 陈锦波：自动化行政合法性证成的基本逻辑 |
| 摘要：自动化行政是行政机关借助自动化设备作出行政行为的情形，其本质是以机器学习算法为核心的人工智能技术对行政活动的参与。由于机器学习算法可以自我学习、具有黑箱特性且可能缩短甚至直接绕过人类来思考，所以它在直接或辅助行政机关作出行政决定时会对行政法治统合下的课责和监督机制形成一定挑战。即便如此，自动化行政本身的合法性仍然可以被有效证成。一方面，机器学习算法对行政决定作出过程的参与，不会在根本上 |
| Time:2023-09-17 |
| |
| 高圣平：论时间的经过对抵押权行使的影响——基于民法典实施之后的裁判分歧的展开和分析 |
| 作者：高圣平（中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心研究人员，中国人民大学法学院教授，法学博士） 出处：《比较法研究》2023年第2期 目次 一、引言 二、《民法典》第419条中“主债权诉讼时效期间”的性质与计算 三、《民法典》第419条中“人民法院不予保护”的法律意义 四、《民法典》第419条的类推适用 五、结语 摘要：抵押权属于物权 |
| Time:2023-09-17 |
| |
| 王万华：行政复议制度属性与行政复议法完善 |
| 【作者】王万华(中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院教授、博士生导师） 【来源】《法学杂志》2023年第4期“专题：行政复议法的完善” 【基金项目】本文为2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“法治政府建设的程序立法研究”（项目编号：22JJD820026）的阶段性成果 内容提要：《中华人民共和国行政复议法（修订草案）》新增规定“发挥行政复议化解行政争议主渠道作用”。回应这一修法目的，修订本 |
| Time:2023-09-17 |
| |
| 共有 5,214 条 首页 上一页 下一页 尾页 共有 348 页 当前第 297 页 |